>
19th Jul, 2007

Dean, McCain, Hillary, Imus, Falwell, Coulter and Harry Potter’s Magic Wand: A New Year’s Predictions Scorecard

With everyone talking Harry Potter and magic in the air it is time to assess if this psychic was right in the twelve predictions about the coming year in America that I made January 1. How many were right? How many were wrong? How many were so uncanny you wonder if Harry Potter himself did not have a hand in them.

Prediction One: Dean vs Emmanuel

In January I said Dean would have a tough time winning this battle, which is proving prophetic. Howard Dean appears to have fallen off the edge of the earth. As his speeches and writings have diminished, apparently so has his influence. More ominously, no current candidate refers to him or his ideas. If the Democratic Party ignores or eases out Howard Dean, it will not only lose an important voice, but more pointedly it will have shot itself in the foot.

Prediction Two: McCain Troubles

My prediction that John McCain would have trouble winning the GOP presidential nomination has also proven true. What I did not expect was that he would implode so quickly. Given that none of his opponents has captures the imaginations of either the public or the Republican Party, I will predict Newt Gingrich will enter the race late this summer or early fall.

Prediction Three: The Democratic Nominees

As this prediction pointed out, it appears the Democratic nomination could become a Hillary vs anti-Hillary race. Barack Obama’s fundraising has surprised many; his speeches thus far have not been inspiring. That the man who ignited the last Democratic convention should thus far have given lackluster speeches may be this year’s biggest surprise. John Edwards continues strong in Iowa. The other big surprise has been the emergence of Bill Richardson from the pack. He promises to make this an exciting race that can only benefit the party. He could pull off a surprise in Iowa and seriously wound Clinton.

Prediction Four: Congress

The Democratic Congress started on a dead run with its 100 hours program but now appears to have stalled facing Iraq. The biggest surprise has been its conservative use of its investigative powers.

Prediction Five: Iraq

With Republicans defecting from the president, this war appears to be heading for a final showdown. Bush no longer has the votes to continue his present policy. The so-called “surge” has turned into a scourge. No one will vote to commit more troops. The Iraqis have made it plain they want us to leave. Both parties are moving toward a “blame the victim” ending which says the mess is the Iraqis’ fault. If the Democrats buy into this, they will lose one of their strongest cards for 2008.

Prediction Six: No Child Left Behind

I predicted what would emerge would be a compromise that would modify but not eliminate the Act. That seems to be where the Democrats and many education organizations are headed. No one seems to have any stomach for cutting the testing, or fully funding the mandates, or eliminating the “penalties.” Most of all, no one, including the presidential candidates seems to want to eliminate the bill.

Prediction Seven: Taxes

I had assumed by now that the GOP would once again resume their old taxes line. Thus far that does not seem to have occurred, which is a sign of the disarray in the GOP. Meanwhile the Democratic candidates still treat taxes as the infamous third rail which none of them wants to get near. All their proposals once again focus on slight of hand accounting.

Prediction Eight: The Neglected

I stated that issues such as electronic voting and media concentration–two of the most crucial concerns facing this nation would not be on the table. Unfortunately this one was right. If so, the chickens will come home to roost in 2008–to the detriment of the Democrats.

Prediction Nine: The Economy

Wall Street seems to think all is going well and the Bush tax cuts have worked. That is like saying because the sun comes up every morning when I wake up that my waking up makes the sun come up. The housing bubble continues to be fragile, health care is threatening to implode as the UAW enters into contract negotiations, and gas prices have everyone scared. But Wall Street does not live where the rest of us do.

Prediction Ten: The Religious Right

The disappearance of the Religious Right from the political scene reminds me of the ominous quiet before a storm. Admittedly the death of Jerry Falwell deprived them of their most visible spokesperson, but Falwell’s personal influence was always exaggerated. Much less recognized, but more powerful are figures like Dr. Morris H. Chapman, head of the Southern Baptist Convention. According to its website the SBC claims 16 million members who worship in more than 42,000 churches in the United States. That still ranks as one of the most powerful grassroots organizations in America. They will be heard from.

Prediction Eleven: Blog Scandal

My fellow blogger Francis Holland believes this prediction has already come true. See “The Indictment of Markos Alberto Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA by Justice and History” As Field Negro says, “Markos, if this is true you’re going to have a lot of explaining to do!” The bigger question is why is it blogs in the AfroSpear who are posting this information while so-called Whitosphere progressive blogs have said little?

Prediction Twelve: The Fall of the Raucous Right

I predicted either O’Reilly or Limbaugh would take a fall, but instead it was Don Imus. Imus’ despicable remarks finally alerted people to the slop spewed out by these purveyors of hate. Thanks should go the C. Vivian Stringer and the Rutgers University Women’s basketball team for their class act in showing how to stand up to this verbal abuse. Second place goes to Ann Coulter who finally inserted her foot too far in a certain part of her anatomy.

On the other hand, attempts to revive the Fairness Doctrine, which would cut down on this BS look dead on arrival. Of the present field of Democrats running for president only Dennis Kucinich has vigorously campaigned for its reinstatement. That’s a shame. To quote one of my favorite posters, Nicole Belle at Crooks and Liars:

I can’t think of anything that would derail the right wing noise machine than bringing back the Fairness Doctrine. Can you imagine how much Fox News would have to revamp their programming? It would be unrecognizable.

So I will end with another prediction: the Fairness Doctrine will be an issue in the 2008 campaign. People like Coulter will make it so.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print Print

Responses

A fresh analysis of the timeline of the life of Markos C.A. Moultisas Zúñiga (MAMZ), based on testimony he gave in his speech at the Commonwealth Club on June 2, 2006, proves that MAMZ must have been at the CIA for AT LEAST one year, and maybe TWO YEARS. Wiki: Markos Moulitsas Zúñiga

This means that after MAMZ completed the standard six-month CIA interviewing period, he must have accepted to be trained by the CIA WITH PAY in the months that followed.

This is NOT what MAMZ has told the public, and it appears that he must clearly have lied about the nature and duration of his involvement with the CIA. In his June 2, 2006 speech to the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, MAMZ said that he began “interviewing” at the CIA in 2001.

PLEASE LISTEN TO THE AUDIOTAPE
FOR VERIFICATION.

During the Commonwealth Club speech, MAMZ ALSO said that his time at the CIA ended when he began working for Howard Dean. However, upon reviewing the historical record, it was only on 18 months later, on June 9, 2003 that MAMZ “officially” announced at DailyKos that his consulting firm, (Jerome) Armstrong/Zúñiga, had won a consulting contract with Howard Dean’s presidential campaign.

On June 9, 2003, MAMZ announced at DailyKos, “I’ve been on the road a lot the past few months ( . . . ) the bulk of it was for my new political consulting firm (alongside my partner). I spent this weekend in Burlington, VT, where we officially accepted work on behalf of presidential candidate Howard Dean” DailyKos Archives

So, count the months: Even if MAMZ began his time at the CIA on December 31, 2001, he would have to have still been there 17 months later if he turned down permanent employment at the CIA because he began to work for Howard Dean. Wiki: Markos Moulitsas Zúñiga

This analysis of the timeline is based on MAMZ’s own words. This proves that, based on MAMZ own recollection of events, he MUST have worked at the CIA for at least 18 months, including a full year AFTER he started DailyKos.

Since MAMZ started DailyKos May 22, 2002, the inescapable conclusion of this analysis of the timeline is that MAMZ was employed and training at the CIA for at least 17 to 18 months during the very same period when he was leading an ostensibly leftist anti-war blog.

It does seem to present a very serious conflict of interest and breach of the public trust to lead an anti-war blog at the same time that one is secretly working for a Government agency whose job is to investigate, infiltrate and disrupt anti-war activities.

Because the proof comes from a careful analysis of MAMZ’s own words, this is no longer in the realm of “conspiracy theories.” It is an infiltration in-fact of the anti-war movement and the Democratic Party by an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Because of censorship issues at MyLeftWing (in that we have been ordered by the owner, Maryscott OConnor, not to investigate the MAMZ/CIA facts any further at that blog, and some of us have been banned for insisting on doing so) Peeder of MyLeftWing has started a new blog – “Political Fleshfeast” – specifically for the purpose of continuing the investigation and analysis of CIA infiltration the Establishment blogosphere, blog apartheid, and other issues whose investigation leads to bannings at the Establishment blogs.

At this new blog, the blogger who first broke the story at MyLeftWing of MAMZ’s CIA involvement, Stupiddy, has been re-analyzing the biographical information provided by Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga (MAMZ).

To make this story easier for the reading public to follow, I have prepared a MS Word-based chronological timeline table of Markos C.A. Moulitsas’ life, that makes the graphic and visual case that MAMZ was probably on the CIA payroll for as long as two years, based on his own statements.

Leave a response

Your response: